Two courts have reached similar conclusions in product markets that go to the heart of Google’s business,
Google has willfully engaged in a series of anticompetitive acts to acquire and maintain monopoly power in the publisher ad server and ad exchange markets for open-web display advertising,
The court found that our advertiser tools and our acquisitions, such as DoubleClick, don't harm competition,
In addition to depriving rivals of the ability to compete, this exclusionary conduct substantially harmed Google's publisher customers, the competitive process, and, ultimately, consumers of information on the open web,
Google's monopolies allow it to soak up excessive profits, leaving less for the workers and businesses whose livelihoods depend on online advertising,
The open web is so deeply rooted in Google's advertising technology that any change to the status quo could crush vulnerable publishers,
We won half of this case and we will appeal the other half,
The extent of the fallout will depend on the legal remedies employed,
There is no such thing as breaking up Google in the abstract,
A breakup of how [Google] drives their advertising revenue would be detrimental to the overall business model,
I don’t think we have really seen this before,
We disagree with the court’s decision regarding our publisher tools,
It’s the vertical integration that led to the conduct Brinkema found problematic,
It is likely that he is writing on a clean slate and she is not,