What makes it so astonishing to me is that in any other institution or work place this would be dealt with so differently.
Think about the Palestinian arrest warrants.
In any other professional setting, someone facing such serious allegations would have been expected to step down months ago,
The cases and investigations have been carried out by professionals,
There is no truth to suggestions of such misconduct,
It was with deep sadness that I understood reports of misconduct were to be aired publicly in relation to me,
In light of escalating media reports, I have made the considered decision to take leave,
Our client remains the prosecutor, has not stepped down and has no intention of doing so,
My decision is driven by deep and unwavering commitment to the credibility of our office and the court, and to safeguard the integrity of the process and fairness to all involved,
Our client does wish to make clear, however, that it is categorically untrue that he has engaged in sexual misconduct of any kind."
Removing Khan is not enough. The entire tribunal, including his prosecutorial team and judges, enabled his blood libel. The scandal points to the inherent defects of the institution - a total lack of accountability."
Make no mistake: the problem is bigger than Khan. They’re throwing him under the bus to protect the institution and salvage their campaign against Israel. But the rot runs deep. This was never about justice, it was always about a political agenda,
This fundamentally undermines the integrity of the case, and in a normal judicial system, would lead not just to these charges being thrown out, but cast doubt on all his prior cases."
Our client is cooperating fully and transparently with the investigation by the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) in relation to allegations that have been raised against him."
Given that the ICC has only managed to secure final convictions against six people for atrocity crimes in its quarter-century of existence, a massive scandal of prosecutorial misconduct should be grounds for shutting down the institution, not just removing the prosecutor."
As there is a pending request, I can’t offer comment or speculation on its outcome."
Stepping aside helps protect the court’s credibility and the trust of victims, staff, and the public. For the alleged victim and whistleblowers, this is also a moment of recognition and dignity,
The casualties [of her allegations] will unfortunately be three: You and your family, me and my family and the justice of the victims.”