Trump team calls on Supreme Court to end humanitarian protections for 530,000 immigrants

That discretionary rescission of a discretionary benefit should have been the end of the matter: Congress reserved those decisions exclusively to the Secretary, who weighed foreign-policy objectives and other factors and rendered her decision,

Sauer wrote

Everyone - sponsors, beneficiaries, communities and the economy alike - benefit from humanitarian parole,

Tumlin added

This Court will not entertain the Government’s result-oriented rewriting of a judicial order that clearly says what it says,

Whitehead wrote Monday