If you're ordering a plane today it's not going to be on your landing strip for at least five years,
We are deeply honored that Qatar Airways has placed this record-breaking order with Boeing, one that solidifies their future fleet,
The plane would have to be thoroughly scrubbed to ensure that listening devices had not been implanted. That would take a great deal of time, to make sure that it meets the security standards that the president needs,
The transaction strikes me as being rife with political espionage, ethical and constitutional problems,
I’m not a fan of Qatar. I think they have a really disturbing pattern of funding theocratic lunatics who want to murder us, funding Hamas and Hezbollah. And that’s a real problem,
Trump cannot accept a $400 million flying palace from the royal family of Qatar. Not only is this farcically corrupt, it is blatantly unconstitutional."
So the fact that the Defense Department is getting a GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE, of a 747 aircraft to replace the 40 year old Air Force One, temporarily, in a very public and transparent transaction, so bothers the Crooked Democrats that they insist we pay, TOP DOLLAR, for the plane,
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."
When I first came in, I signed an order to get (the new Air Force One fleet) built,
Antonin Scalia, when he worked at the Justice Department, certainly agreed since he issued an opinion in 1974 pointing out that when the Constitution refers to an ‘officer,’ ‘it invariably refers to someone other than the President or Vice President,’
I also think the plane poses significant espionage and surveillance problems,
If this gift is being considered as a gift to the government of the U.S., there is no legal issue to consider, since there is no constitutional or legal problem with such a gift. If this is a personal gift to the president, the Justice Department would be weighing the constitutional issue I have raised – whether the emoluments clause even applies to the president,
If we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department, during a couple of years whole they’re [Boeing is] building the other one, I think that’s a very nice gesture [from Qatar],
Enforcing the emoluments clause in the courts would face similar challenges [in his second term], including the challenge of finding a plaintiff who has standing to challenge the violations,
If he wants it, and he says 'I'll accept any risk associated with not having all the stuff the real Air Force One has,' he can do that,
Air Force One is designed to be survivable in all kinds of environments, including a nuclear war,
I don’t see any basis for this accusation, unless there are some people who are just trying to select who should be a friend of the U.S. and who should not,
No one gives someone a $400 million jet for free without expecting anything in return. Be serious,
If it's a gift to the U.S., that's different. But if it's a gift just to Trump, then I wouldn't be for it,
I think it's a good idea for the country to accept that. We've accepted other gifts from other countries, including the Statue of Liberty, so I can't see a problem with that,